КНИЖЕВНОСТА КАКО ЈАНУС – ЗА ДИХОТОМИЈАТА МЕЃУ УСНАТА И ПИШАНАТА КНИЖЕВНОСТ

Authors

  • Kristina Dimovska Institute of Folklore “Marko Cepenkov”, Ss Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Macedonia , , Институт за фолклор „Марко Цепенков“ Универзитет „Св. Кирил и Методиј“, Скопје, Македонијa , , ,

Keywords:

written literature, oral literature, epic speaker, epic performance, epic author, epic formulae, jongleur, tradition

Abstract

The dichotomy, or the ambivalence of the literary system, presents a basis for this research paper, which aims at portraying the two constitutive models of literature, i.e., the written and the oral model. The former one is often acknowledged as exclusive, sophisticated, refined and intellectual, versus the latter, as its inversion, plebeian, inclusive, crude and illiterate. Our goal will be to show the inaccuracy of this axiological treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Philological Studies Vol.12 No.1 2014

Downloads

Published

2019-10-24

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2014): Philological Studies

Section

History and Philology

License

Philological studies © 2019. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License

How to Cite

КНИЖЕВНОСТА КАКО ЈАНУС – ЗА ДИХОТОМИЈАТА МЕЃУ УСНАТА И ПИШАНАТА КНИЖЕВНОСТ. (2019). Philological Studies, 12(1), 54-70. http://194.149.137.236/index.php/philologicalstudies/article/view/438

Most read articles by the same author(s)