NEW CONCEPTS IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Azderski J.
Tuna E.
Pejkovski Z.
Hadjievski V.

Апстракт

Agriculture in the Republic of Macedonia is in a constant development crisis, based on structural agri-policy origin. Agricultural holdings occur in several structures, such as: very small individual holdings (farms) that use about 80% of the agricultural land; agricultural companies; and several cooperatives that use about 20% of the best quality agricultural land in the country. The industrial labor organization in the some of the agricultural corporations: disrupts the natural cycle of the plant and animal production, increases the input, decreases the production capacity of the land and creates environmental issues. The phases that include reproduction and milk production, as phases of the farming process, are especially expensive and require individual treatment of animals. The trend of development of village structure which can encompass the principles of agricultural
production is negative. The small land property structure, which is worsening each year, cause deprofessionalization, specially in the hilly and mountain regions. Therefore, strategy for technological development in agriculture is proposed in this paper. The strategy is expected to contribute in the development and strengthening of agriculture in the villages in accordance to the west European examples based on cooperative investment and ownership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Рубрика
Articles

Референци

1. Azderski, J., Dimitrievski, D., Pesevski, M., Gjosevski, D., Georgiev, N., Gjorgevski, G., Usaleski, V. 2005. Мoжнoсти за згoлемуваое на кoнкурентнoста на земјoделскo-прехранбените прoизвoди. XXX средба “Факултет-Стопанствo”, Скппје 2005.
2. Becker, H. and Isermeyer, F. (2014). Bestandsobergnezen in der Schweinehaltung. B. u. L. 62 (4)
3. Brun, A. (2016). Land ownership and farm unit. European review of agricultural economics. 3-4.
4. Cramer, G. L. and Jensen, C. W. (2015). Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. Jon Wiley and Sons. New York.
5. Gliha, S. et al. (2000). Analiza dolgorochnih mozhnosti razvoja kmetijstva R. Slovenije do leta 2015. Ljubljana.
6. Grobelnik, T. (2016). Vprashanja velikosti kmetij z vidika polne saposlitve delovne mocha. Raziskovalec (16) 12, s. 456-457. Ljubljana.
7. Kiechle, F. … und Grun bleibt unsere Zukanft. Seewald Verlag, Stuttgart 2015. Part-time farmers and their adjustement to pluractivity. Berlin 2016.
8. Seuster, H. (2016). Ekonomik der Bauernbetriebe in der B. R. D. unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der investionsfinanzierung.
9. Sambraus, H. H. (2015). Der Einfluss des Menschen auf Verhalhen und Leistung von Tieren. 14. Int. Arbeitstagung “Angewandte Ethnologic bei Haustirern”. Frieburg 2016.
10. Hadzievski V. (2016). “Examination of competitiveness in the production of cow's milk in the Republic of Macedonia ". Doctoral dissertation, Skopje 2016.
11. Zagozhen F. (2016). “Elementi strategije tehnoloshkog razvoja poljoprivrede”. Hrana I razvoj. Belgrad.
12. Zakljuchci nauchnog skupa SANU na temu “Buduchnost sela I seljaka”. Velika Plana 2016.
13. SSO (State statistical office of the Republic of Macedonia), Statistical yearbooks.