THE IMPACT OF USING COMBINATIONS OF N, S AND B IN OILSEED RAPE - BRASSICA NAPUS L. ON QUANTITATIVE PROPERTIES OF SEED

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (English)
Објавено: Sep 1, 2018

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Igor Iljovski
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Romina Kabranova
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Zoran Dimov
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Vjekoslav Tanaskovikj
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Ile Canev
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Tatjana Prentovic
Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food - Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

Апстракт

As a result of the use of the following elements - nitrogen (N), sulphur (S) and boron (B) - quantitative properties of two genotypes of oilseed rape - Brassica napus L., Zorica (variety) and Rohan (hybrid) were determined. The main purpose of the study was determination of the production mode, set in both genotypes of oilseed rape versus managing various nutrients. An experiment was set in the Skopje region, on total experimental area of 650m2. For this purpose, the following combinations of fertilizers were used: N1 with 110 kg/ha nitrogen, N2 with 150 kg/ha nitrogen, S1 with 30 kg/ha sulphur, S2 with 70 kg/ha sulphur, B1 with 1.0 kg/ha boron, and B2 with 2.0 kg/ha boron (at spring time, foliar application) versus standard variant: N:P:K in the ratio 10:20:30 (N 50kg/ha, 90 kg/ha P2O5 and 180 kg/ha K2O) used in autumn. During the experiment the following parameters were monitored: height of plants (cm), number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, length of pod (cm), number of seeds in the silique, and seed yield (t/ha). From the combinations of nutrients and variations that have been set in terms of genotypes, the results of yield showed statistical significance at level of 0.05 from variants N2PK, N2PK+S2+B2 in variety Zorica and N1PK+S1+B1 in the hybrid Rohan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Издание
Том 72 Бр. 2 (2018): Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, JAFES
Рубрика
Articles

Референци

1. Barker A. V., Bryson G. M. (2006). Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA 2149.
2. Brennan R., Mason M., Walton G. (2000). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the concentrations of oil and protein in canola (Brassica napus) seed. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 23(3), 339-348.
3. Falk K., Tokuhisa J., Gershenzon J. (2007). The effect of sulfur nutrition on plant glucosinolate content: physiology and molecular mechanisms. Plant Biology, 9 (5), 573-58.
4. Fageria N. K., Baligar V. C., LiY. C.(2000).The Role of Nutrient Efficient Plants in Improving Crop Yields in the Twenty First Century, Journal of Plant Nutrition, Volume 31, pages 1121-1157.
5. Grant C., Bailey L. (1993). Fertility management in canola production. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 73(3), 651-670.
6. Gupta U. (2007). Boron, in A.V. Barker, D.J. Pilbeam (eds.) Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA 241-277.
7. Karamanos R., Goh T., Flaten D. (2007). Nitrogen and sulphur fertilizer management for growing canola on sulphur sufficient soils. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 87(2), 201-210.
8. Karamanos R., Goh T., Stonehouse T. (2003). Canola response to boron in Canadian prairie soils. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 83(2), 249-259.
9. Malhi S. S. (2001). Improving Canola Yields with Balanced and Efficient Nutrition. Final report prepared for canola council of Canada [Online] www.saskcanola.com/ quadrant/System/research/reports/report-Malhi-balancednutrition-long.pdf
10. Malhi S., Gill K. (2002). Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 82(4), 665-674. 11. Malhi S., Raza M., Schoenau J., Mermut A., Kutcher R., Johnston A., Gill, K. (2003). Feasibility of boron fertilization for yield, seed quality and B uptake of canola in northeastern Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 83(1), 99-108.
12. Nadian H., Najarzadegan R., Saeid K. A., Gharineh M., Siadat A. (2010). Effects of Boron and Sulfur Application on Yield and Yield Components of Brassica napus L. in a Calcareous Soil. World Applied Sciences Journal, 11(1), 89-95.
13. Porter, P. (1993). Canola response to boron and nitrogen grown on the southeastern coastal plain 1. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 16(12), 2371-2381.
14. Rathke G.W., Christen O., Diepenbrock W. (2005). Effects of nitrogen source and rate on productivity and quality of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown in different crop rotations. Field Crops Research, 94 (2), 103-113.
15. Shorrocks V. M. (1997). The occurrence and correction of boron deficiency. Plant and Soil, 193 (1-2), 121-148.
16. Stevenson F. J., Cole M. A. (1999). Cycles of soils: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients: Wiley.com
17. Troeh F. R., Thompson L. M. (2005). Soils and soil fertility: Blackwell Ames 211-231, 269-305.
18. Ukrainetz H., Soper R. J., Nyborg M. (1975). Plant nutrient requirements of oilseed and pulse crop, in J. T. Harapiack, ed. Oilseed and pulse crops in western Canada - A symposium. Western Cooperative Fertilizers Ltd.Calgary, AB 325-374.
19. Weber E., BleiholderH. 1990. Erläuterungen zu den BBCH-Dezimal-Codes für die Entwicklungsstadien von Mais, Raps, Faba-Bohne, Sonnenblume und Erbse – mit Abbildungen. Gesunde Pflanzen 42, 308-321.