ДЕЈВИД ХЈУМ ЗА УБАВИНАТА И ЗА ВКУСОТ (300 ГОДИНИ ОД РАЃАЊЕТО НА ФИЛОЗОФОТ)

Ivan Dzeparovski

Ivan Dzeparovski University of Skopje, Macedonia

Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate the main ideas of David Hume’s philosophical and aesthetical approaches and to stress that the significance of his interpretations of beauty and taste today are even more important then hundred years ago. This year (2011), celebrating 300 years from the birth of the philosopher (1711) it’s very important, once again, to point out that Hume’s essay “Of the Standard of Taste” today is a canonical text connected with the category of taste, and according to the opinions of the most important contemporary aestheticians (Beardsley, Shelley, Dickie), along with Kant’s third Critic, it is foundation work of the modern aesthetical theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beardsley, M.C. 1975. The Problem of Taste: Shaftesbury to Hume. In: Aesthetics
from Classical Greece to the Present. Tuscaloosa and London: The University
of Alabama Press. P. 178–191.
Bosanquet, B. 1892. A History of Aesthetic. London; New York: Swan
Sonnneschein & Co., MacMillan & Co.
Cassirer, E. 1951[1932]. The Philosophy of the Enlightement. Princeton, New
Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Dickie, G. 1997. Hume. in: Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analityc Approach, New
York. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Р. 16–18.
Gilbert, K. E.; Kuhn, H. 2004 [1954]. Istorija estetike. Beograd: Dereta.
Gracyk, T. 2011. Delicasy in Hume’s Theory of Taste. In: The Journal of Scottish
Philosophy. 9.1(2011). P. 1–16.
Grlić, D. 1976. D.Hjum: Razum treba da služi emocijama. U: Estetika, tom II.
Zagreb: Naprijed. S. 35–38.
Hume, D. 1963[1757]. “Of the Rise and Progress of the Arts and Sciences” and “Of
the Standard of Taste”. In: Essays: Moral, Political and Litarary, Oxford:
Oxford University Press. P. 112–138; 231–255.
Hume, D. 1999[1748]. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Tom L.
Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. 2007[1739–40]. A Treatise of Human Nature: A Critical Edition. Vol. 1.
Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hutcheson, Francis. 2004[1726]. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of
Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises. Ed. Wolfgang, Leidhold. Indianapolis:
Liberty Fund.
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper. 2001[1711]. Characteristics of Men,
Manners, Opinions, Times. 3 vols. Ed. Douglas den Uyl. Indianapolis: Liberty
Fund.
Shelley, J. 2001. Empiricism: Hutcheson and Hume. In: The Routledge Companion
to Aesthetics. Ed. B. Gaut & D. McIver Lopes. London & New York: Routledge.
P. 37–49.
Stirling, J. H. 1898[1865]. The Secret of Hegel. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd: 1st ed.
(2 vols.) 1865; 2nd rev ed. (1 vol.).
Stolnitz, J. 1961.’Beauty’: Some Stages in the History of an Idea. In: Journal of the
History of Ideas. 22. P. 185–204.
Tatarkiewicz, W. 1970–1974. History of Aesthetics. Vol. I-III. The Hague; ParisWarszawa: Mouton-PWN.
Кант, И. 2005. Критика на моќта на судењето (прев. К.Б.Колбе). Во: Убавина и
уметност (прир.) И. Џепароски, Скопје: Магор. С. 195–238.
Коен, Л. 1991. Хјумово схватање лепоте. У: Д.Хјум, О мерилу укуса (избор,
превод и предговор: Л.Коен). Сремски Карловци; Нови Сад: ИКЗС; Добра
Вест. С. 5–43.
Убавина и уметност. 2005. Џепароски, И. (прир.). Скопје: Магор.
Хјум, Д. 2005. За мерилото на вкусот (прев. И. Џепароски). Во: Убавина и
уметност (прир.) И.Џепароски. Скопје: Магор. С. 163–181.