Yangzhu – enfant terrible filosfskega daoizma

  • Jana Rošker Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani, Slovenija

Сажетак

Yang Zhu, a Chinese philosophers from the 4th Century BC, has been in the history of Chinese philosophy regarded as a selfish hedonist, unable of virtuous life in community, structured in accordance with rigid Confucian philosophy. As such, the official Confucian historiography has always marked him as a heretic thinker, unworthy of being a real philosopher. The present article tries to reject such an interpretation of Yang Zhu's philosophy and to expose the fact, that his opus should be regarded as an extraordinarily egalitarian philosophy, striking for freedom, dignity and personal integrity of every individual in society. The article follows the presumption, according to which Yang Zhu is the very representative of classical Daoism, who tried in his work to consistently realize the principle of social tolerance, autonomy and individual freedom in the sense of »to live and to let live«.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Референце

Forke. Alfred. 1934. Geschichte der alten chinesischen Philosophie (I.),
Hamburg: R.Oldenbourg Verlag.
Fung. Yu-lan. 1953. A History of Chinese Philosophy, (prev. Bodde, Derk),
New Jersey: Princenton University Press.
Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1989. Marginalia Sino-logica, v: Understanding the
Chinese Mind – The Philosophical Roots, (ur.: Allinson, Robert E.), Oxford, New
York: Oxford University Press, str. 125 – 166.
Hu Shi. 1984. Zhongguo zhexue shi da gang (Oris zgodovine kitajske
filozofije), Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
Liezi. 1998. Liezi (Mojster Lie), (ur.in kom.: Yang Hong), Lanzhou: Gansu
minzu chuban she.
Liu. Xiaogan. 1988. On the Concept of Naturalness (Tzu-Jan) in Lao Tzu‛s
Philosophy, v: Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Dialogue Publishing Company, 25: 4,
Honolulu, Hawai, str. 422 – 445.
Mengzi. 1997. Mengzi (Mojster Meng /Mencij/), (ur. in kom.: Liang Haiming),
Shenyang: Liaoning minzu chuban she.
Rošker. Jana. 2006. Iskanje poti – spoznavna teorija v kitajski tradiciji, 1. del:
Od protokonfucianskih klasikov do neokonfucianizma dinastije Song, Ljubljana:
Znanstveni inštitut filozofske fakultete (zbirka Razprave).
Објављено
2019-10-30
Секција
Филозофско-културне проблеме