THE UNION OF FLORENCE AND PUSHKIN’S DRAMATIC REPRESENTATION OF TSAR DMITRY
Аннотация
My thesis is that, in his drama Boris Godunov, Pushkin did not work solely on the Time of Troubles, but having chosen events that happened around 1600 he opened up the older issues that shaped them. Namely this concerns the polarization that occurred after the Council of Florence (1439). Although this council confirmed cultural plurality and recognized both Latin and Byzantine ritual practices and wordings of the Creed as valid, it was rejected during the reign of Muscovite Grand Duke Basil II, the Blind.
Скачивания
Литература
департамента народного просвещения. 1831. In: Фомичев, Сергей –
Виролайнен, Мария: Комментарии. Пушкин: Борис Годунов.
Москва: Новое издательство. 2008. ISBN 978-5-98379-107-7.
Пушкин, Александр С. Борис Годунов. Полное собрание сочинений в 10 томах.
Том V. Издательство академии наук. Москва. 1958.
Dunning, Chester. The Tragic Fate of Pushkin’s Comedy. The Exiled PoetHistorian. In: The Uncensored Boris Godunov. The Case for Pushkin’s Original
Comedy. Wisconsin: Center for Pushkin Studies. 2006, ISBN 0-299-20764-1
(pbk).
Emerson, Caryl. The Ebb and Flow of Influence. Tragedy, Comedy, Carnival, and
History on the Stage. In: Dunning, Chester (Ed.): The Uncensored Boris
Godunov. The Case for Pushkin’s Original Comedy. Wisconsin: Center for
Pushkin Studies. 2006.
Emerson, Caryl and Dunning, Chester. Reconsidering History. In: The Uncensored
Boris Godunov. The Case for Pushkin’s Original Comedy. Wisconsin: Center
for Pushkin Studies. 2006.
Wood, Antony. Comedy about Tsar Boris and Grishka Otrepiev. Translation in:
Dunning, Chester (Ed.): The Uncensored Boris Godunov. The Case for
Pushkin’s Original Comedy. Wisconsin: Center for Pushkin Studies. 2006.
Philological studies © 2019. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License